• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Metacoin

Covering Bitcoin, the Blockchain, Altcoins, and Fintech

  • Start Here
  • Links
  • Disclosures
  • NFTs
  • Collezione

Feb 26 2023

ChatGPT Tackles the World of NFTs and We Rate Their Writing

After the success of our blog post from three weeks ago — here’s a link: ChatGPT Isn’t Taking Your Job — we thought we’d experiment with the tool once again, but this time with the goal of kickstarting our own NFT collection.

So yeah, it’s self-serving as heck. (AND we’ll give you a couple disclaimers: do your own research. Don’t invest more than you can afford to lose. Also, since we created the art here at Metacoin HQ, of course we profit from any sales of the art. That’s capitalism for ya.)

But, as with everything these days, these NFTs are an experiment. Crypto is an experiment. ChatGPT is an experiment. And we put all these experiments together, and watch as it tackles the world of NFTs. How do we rate their writing? Read on…

First, the Background

The collection we asked about was the third we launched on OpenSea, which, to date, has been the leader in the NFT universe. While there have been a few competitors, OpenSea seems to be the leade rin the clubhouse.

Our collection is called “Collezione22” and the 176 pieces were created by us. (More accurately, me. At my computer.) Launched (of course) in 2022, only a few have sold — reminding me of a really off-color and rather sacrilegious Bible-related article from The Onion that I refuse to link to because reasons — so I thought “why not ask ChatGPT to create a post so I can sell more of these [expletive] NFTs?”

So I Went to ChatGPT and Asked…

“Write a 1000 word blog post as a potential investor in NFT art pieces, such as the ones at https://opensea.io/collection/collezione22 and compare their value to those that are focused on pfp or profile photos like cryptopunks and bored apes.”

Before I share the post in its entirety, a caveat: I went in and added links on any of the text where a link is appropriate. ChatGPT isn’t really great at that these days. It will get better and SEO professionals will need to ask what to do next.

Here, then, is the post:

As the world continues to embrace digitalization, the art industry is not left behind. The advent of Non-Fungible Tokens (NFTs) has revolutionized the way art is created, sold, and collected. NFTs provide a unique opportunity for artists to create digital art that is unique and exclusive to the buyer. As an investor, NFTs have caught my attention, and I am particularly interested in art pieces such as the ones found in the collezione22 collection on OpenSea. In this blog post, I will explain why I think investing in NFT art pieces is a wise decision and compare their value to those focused on PFP or profile photos like Cryptopunks and Bored Apes.

Firstly, NFTs provide a unique way to invest in art. Unlike traditional art pieces, NFTs are digital assets that exist on a blockchain. This means that they are unique and cannot be replicated or duplicated. When you buy an NFT, you own the original piece, and you can prove ownership using the blockchain. This is a significant advantage compared to traditional art pieces, which can be easily replicated, and it can be challenging to prove ownership.

NFTs also have a significant advantage in terms of liquidity. Unlike traditional art pieces, which may take time to sell, NFTs can be sold instantly on various online platforms such as OpenSea, Rarible, and Nifty Gateway. This means that if you need to cash out your investment quickly, you can do so easily without having to wait for a buyer.

Another advantage of investing in NFTs is the potential for high returns on investment. In recent months, we have seen some NFTs sell for millions of dollars. For example, the Beeple NFT sold for a record-breaking $69 million at Christie’s auction house. Although not all NFTs sell for millions, some can still provide significant returns on investment. The value of NFTs is driven by various factors, such as the rarity, the artist behind it, and the demand for the piece.

When it comes to NFT art pieces, the collezione22 collection on OpenSea is an excellent place to start. This collection features various digital art pieces from different artists, each with a unique style and theme. The art pieces in this collection range from abstract to realistic, and they are all visually appealing. This collection also provides an opportunity to invest in emerging artists who may become well-known in the future.

While NFT art pieces are an excellent investment opportunity, they are not the only type of NFTs available. Profile photos or PFPs have also become popular in the NFT world. PFPs are digital images that serve as a user’s profile picture on social media platforms. Some examples of PFPs that have gained significant popularity include Cryptopunks and Bored Apes.

Cryptopunks were one of the first NFT projects to gain significant attention. They feature 10,000 unique 8-bit characters that were randomly generated and sold for a fraction of an ether in 2017. Since then, their value has skyrocketed, with some selling for millions of dollars. Bored Apes, on the other hand, feature 10,000 unique digital apes that come with various accessories such as hats, glasses, and jewelry. Bored Apes have also gained significant popularity, with some selling for over $1 million.

While PFPs have gained significant attention, they have a few disadvantages compared to NFT art pieces. Firstly, PFPs lack the uniqueness and exclusivity that NFT art pieces provide. While each PFP may be unique, they do not provide the same level of creativity and originality that NFT art pieces offer. Secondly, PFPs may not have the

Wait, What?

Time to grade this piece. All 594 words of it.

Accuracy: B+

That was actually a pretty good piece in the grand scheme, as it talks about a few of the likely suspects — e.g. OpenSea, Nifty Gateway, Rarible — and whether it makes sense to invest in PFPs (where each is a different character) or artistic NFTs (such as the ones we created) that aren’t unique characters.

It falls short of an “A” rating, though, because it really doesn’t accurately talk about the collection I have on OpenSea. They’re all mine. I guess if someone reached out and said “I have some art!” then we’d talk.

Prose: C

It’s well-written but not too much better than what I could create myself. If I had the time.

So if “average” writing is your thing, then…that’s fine.

Following the Instructions: D-

I asked for 1000 words. I got 594. But this is passable writing, so I can’t give it an “F” grade.

Overall Grade: C

However, let’s think about this holistically. I went to a FREE website and typed in a question and got a response. And it’s good enough to put on the blog. And it might put *some* writers out of business.

But…didn’t you say that ChatGPT isn’t taking my job? What’s a writer to do?

Read My Last Post on the Topic…

Above is image #165 in the series. Art is subjective: you may find that to be a cool image, you may think it’s kinda just there. In the case of ChatGPT, it appears it didn’t think about the image at all.

The next image is #164, the original piece upon which #165 is based. 165 was created by digitally manipulating the original just enough so that it’s different, but still follows the same general color scheme and uses the original flow.

There’s very little room for nuance on ChatGPT, it appears. It does a casual glance based on the text it can find, but you’re not going to get a critique of the artwork.

So where does that leave us?

As we told you before, Google allowed us to outsource our thinking in some respects, and ChatGPT is doing the same. Does that free you up to create? Does it free you up to do a deeper dive on a subject that just cannot be explained by the chatbots?

Yeah, that’s what we think.

Share this:

  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp

Written by David Van de Walle · Categorized: chatgpt, NFT

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Primary Sidebar

Search This Site

Most Popular Posts

Up Arrows Are Nice

Up Only In 2024?

So far so good for the 2024 Growth Portfolio. Here we are, on the way to another wacky crypto year. And things are looking...up. If … [Read More...] about Up Only In 2024?

Liquidity Machine Go BRRRRRR

If you have a hard time keeping up with the latest in crypto, fintech, or any of the other things that keep the economy moving, join the … [Read More...] about Liquidity Machine Go BRRRRRR

Tweets by TeamMetacoin

Recent Posts

  • Q1 2025 Crypto Update
  • The Ten Best Crypto Investments for 2025
  • So You’ve Made A Little Money…
  • Up Only In 2024?
  • Who Needs an ETF When You Have a Growth Portfolio?

Recent Comments

  • pgxp.fr on UPDATED Control Finance News: Site Down, It’s a Scam
  • Victoria Tegg on Using Coinbase – A Primer for Bitcoin Newbies
  • Victoria Tegg on It’s Not Too Late To Invest in Bitcoin, Ethereum, or…
  • Victoria Tegg on Is it too late to invest in Bitcoin?
  • Victoria Tegg on ETF News: Ethereum, or Bitcoin, or Both?

Archives

  • March 2025
  • January 2025
  • November 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • September 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • September 2021
  • July 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • September 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017

Categories

  • 5-coin challenge
  • AI
  • Airdrop
  • AMBIS
  • Ampleforth
  • Antshares
  • Avax
  • Bancor
  • Big Banks
  • Binance
  • Bitcoin
  • Bitconnect
  • Bithaul
  • Bitpetite
  • Bitshares
  • Blockchain Startups
  • Bloq
  • BRED
  • Bytecoin
  • CAPY
  • Cardano
  • Celer
  • chatgpt
  • Chile
  • Coin News
  • Coinbase
  • Coinreum
  • Collezione
  • Compound
  • Control Finance
  • Copihue
  • COSS
  • Creditbit
  • Crypto.com
  • CryptoCrash
  • Cryptotini
  • Curve
  • DAI
  • Dash
  • DeFi
  • DeFi Kingdoms
  • Dego
  • Developer
  • Dice
  • Digibyte
  • Dogecoin
  • DYOR
  • Economy
  • Einsteinium
  • Electroneum
  • Empowr
  • ENS
  • EOS
  • Eryllium
  • Ethereum
  • Exchange
  • Exchanges
  • Exscudo
  • Fetch
  • Golos
  • Growth Portfolio
  • Hedge Fund
  • Hexabot
  • HODL
  • ICO
  • Inflation
  • Interview
  • Investing
  • Kimchi
  • Lending
  • Library
  • Liquidity
  • Litecoin
  • MAGIC
  • Manifesto
  • Marketing & PR
  • MCO
  • MegaCryptoPolis
  • Meme Coins
  • Meta
  • Metamask
  • Microhash
  • Mining
  • NFT
  • Non-Fungible Tokens
  • Not Investment Advice
  • NXT
  • Origin
  • Pancake
  • Passive Income
  • PAX Gold
  • Pickle
  • PIVX
  • Portfolio
  • POW Token
  • Quadruple
  • Ripple
  • Risk Management
  • Rivetz
  • Scam Alert
  • Segwit
  • Shrimp
  • SHTF
  • Siacoin
  • Sketches2021
  • Steemit
  • Stellar
  • Stratis
  • Sushi
  • tacos
  • Tax Day
  • Tierion
  • Torcoin
  • Trading
  • Treasure
  • Trezor
  • Tulips
  • Uncategorized
  • Uniswap
  • USI Tech
  • VeChain
  • Vesper
  • Video
  • Whenhub
  • XRP
  • Yearn Finance

Meta

  • Register
  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

Copyright © 2025 · Altitude Pro on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in